What the scan found
The axe-core rules that failed on the Target homepage, most impactful first.
ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name
aria-dialog-name · serious impact · 1 element
All page content should be contained by landmarks
region · moderate impact · 1 element
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%
meta-viewport-large · minor impact · 1 element
Scanned September 1, 2026 against https://www.target.com. 3 checks needed manual review and are not counted in the score.
What this scan does not cover
Automated checks like this one catch roughly 30–40% of WCAG issues, and this scan covers the homepage only. Manual testing is still required for keyboard flows, screen reader output and content quality.
A clean automated score is a floor, not a pass. If you need the issues an automated homepage check misses, run a full scan on your own site and work through the findings.
What this means
Each failure above is a concrete barrier an automated tool could see without a human in the loop. This is not legal advice, but ADA complaints routinely cite exactly these WCAG 2.1 AA failures — contrast, labels, landmarks and keyboard access.
Business impact
Missed conversions from users who rely on assistive technology, plus higher support costs from inaccessible flows.
Compliance impact
ADA lawsuits often cite WCAG failures like contrast, labels, and keyboard access. Addressing the top issues closes the biggest gaps.
Related resources
Keep exploring accessibility benchmarks and WCAG success criteria.
Fix accessibility issues
Use these free tools and guides to fix the accessibility issues found above:
Check your own site
Run a free ADA + WCAG scan in seconds
Free covers 5 scans a month. Need the site watched instead of checked once? Starter is $29/mo for continuous monitoring, audit trails and PDF/CSV exports.